LOL-who else do they have-Tracy Morgan would get tired of coming so much i think.good god i hope not!
LOL-who else do they have-Tracy Morgan would get tired of coming so much i think.good god i hope not!
Yay!If they ban belzer we get more Chuck Zito and Dee Snyder!
I really don't get it and I'll never claim to understand it; but the reaction is so visceral and primal, it's gotta have something to do with Howard not adhering to some godlike, elevated, hero worship plane of existence on which they previously held him. Personally, my hero is in Iraq right now and I've never held any celebrities up to such lofty heights. No person can survive that, so eventually they'll disappoint you and there is nothing more to do except tear them down.
Anyone else bored with the Stamos interview? No new trip's to Disney World? zzz
LOL What a bunch of jumbled up bullshit.
LOL What a bunch of jumbled up bullshit. I shouldn't get lured in but I cannot resist. Yess...Howard is a god but obviously not your conventual role model god... He is a sometimes monster god..... a god of entertainment... a rffing god... a hero to the super cynical critics in the world of Stern.... a god who had no sacred cows (other than his various projects that were languishing)... Comparing him to some hero in Iraq is ridiculous.... it's apples and oranges......
Good button pushing..
Ignore trust me.LOL What a bunch of jumbled up bullshit. I shouldn't get lured in but I cannot resist. Yess...Howard is a god but obviously not your conventual role model god... He is a sometimes monster god..... a god of entertainment... a rffing god... a hero to the super cynical critics in the world of Stern.... a god who had no sacred cows (other than his various projects that were languishing)... Comparing him to some hero in Iraq is ridiculous.... it's apples and oranges......
Good button pushing..
Ignore trust me.
LOL:hah:Naaahh... It's all in good fun.. And he (she?) who shall remain nameless is the forum foil.
Naaahh... It's all in good fun.. And he (she?) who shall remain nameless is the forum foil.
Gee, a few months back when Belzer was on, people were asking "who the fuck is this guy?" or complaining about him being another guest from the past like Dice or Dee. Now since Howard got pissed at him, he's an A-lister who is irreplacable on the show. Now I love Belzer, but he's certainly not appeared enough to be that integral to the show, he's certainly not A-list and despite his long run as Munch, he does sort of compare more to Dee, Dice and David Brenner than Tracy Morgan or Toby McGuire.
As far as I'm concerned, the only irreplacable guest from then, now, and probably the future is Gilbert. Period. YMMV (more than likely depending on who Howard defends Beth against that particular day).
Don't count me in among those that asked who Belzer was a couple of months ago, I loved that he was on the show recently, he helped to make that show totally worthwhile. I don't really remember anyone asking who Belzer was, by the way.
When I posted about the irony involved with the state of the show of today with that of the early 90's, I only did so to highlight how the players have remained the same, but how their status within the show has changed. I didn't write it to put the current state of the show down in any way, I only did so to show a spotlight on how much it has changed and how strange it is to me; Chevy can go to Howard's wedding in jeans and deliver a Governale type of roast and he's "queen of the prom" in Howard's eyes, while Belzer is shunned away and made to appear to be selfish without so much as a word from the man himself in his own defense. It's just weird to think about it, from an early "90's perspective" kind of way.
I don't care if Belzer is considered an "A", "B" or "D" list celebrity, I think he adds a great energy to the show that I think is mostly lacking these days. I wish he were on more often. I wish Richard Lewis was in more often. I love comedians that treat the news segment as an opportunity to crack wise and make with the funny.
Packie (if I can call you Packie), I almost never direct my comments at you or your posts. You should know that by now. I direct them at the foaming at the mouth retards who pounce on any mention of Beth as evidence that the devil himself possessed Howard and made him marry a horse faced troll who's only purpose is to sabotage the show.
I too love Belzer, but as the few sane people in here have said, canceling 5 minutes before the gig was a dick move and no one would blink at Howard bagging on him if it didn't involve the NSAL. After all, aren't these the same folks who bitched for weeks after Howard blew off Gary's dad's wake at the last minute, hmmmm?
I too love Belzer, but as the few sane people in here have said, canceling 5 minutes before the gig was a dick move and no one would blink at Howard bagging on him if it didn't involve the NSAL. After all, aren't these the same folks who bitched for weeks after Howard blew off Gary's dad's wake at the last minute, hmmmm?
What else would it involve? If you are talking about the show OK..., blowing off the show is grounds for an old fashioned Howard war. But the NSAL is not the show... at least not yet.
Howard blowing off Gary's dad's wake and then defending it was wonderfully unfeeling. Remember a few years back when Howard talked about how he had no friends at the station and that he had no more feeling for Gary than a door? And, of course, Howard's walkout on poor Gary and Mary's grand dinner was against monsterously unfeeling but very entertaining. Good for the show. Cutting off a great guest like Belzer because he blew off "honey's" fund raiser for dogs is not entertaining and it hurts the show. (And what's with Howard not letting Beth "take a call" from Belzer?)
What else would it involve? If you are talking about the show OK..., blowing off the show is grounds for an old fashioned Howard war. But the NSAL is not the show... at least not yet.
Howard blowing off Gary's dad's wake and then defending it was wonderfully unfeeling. Remember a few years back when Howard talked about how he had no friends at the station and that he had no more feeling for Gary than a door? And, of course, Howard's walkout on poor Gary and Mary's grand dinner was against monsterously unfeeling but very entertaining. Good for the show. Cutting off a great guest like Belzer because he blew off "honey's" fund raiser for dogs is not entertaining and it hurts the show. (And what's with Howard not letting Beth "take a call" from Belzer?)