I haven't seen anyone here bitch about someone not subscribing to cable. What are you talking about?
It's already been established that he wasn't.
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
I haven't seen anyone here bitch about someone not subscribing to cable. What are you talking about?
It's already been established that he wasn't.
I do that sometimes too, either through Airplay or the Apple TV box itself. I don't see where a 60 inch tv requires a cable TV subscription.
No i didn't mean that. I ment when I stream Netflix I like to watch it on my TV. Sorry for the mix up. I'll be honest though we bought that big of a TV with sports in mind. Then movies.
I don't care if a person has cable, satellite or what. My wife and I will keep what we have for as long as we can afford it. That is until they come up with all the sports we watch streaming. We can get most of our shows through Apple or Amazon. The only thing I hate about that is you can't watch a show same day. We have to have same day for shows like Waking Dead, Breaking Bad and Justified. When and if all that happens then yea by by pay TV.
Thanks, fixed..I notice the title should probably say cord-cutting not cost-cutting.
Zombie thread!That would go away if A la carte were to come to fruition. No one wants to pay that much for ads on a channel very few people have in their a la carte packages.
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Tapatalk
Zombie thread!
Verizon's 'customizable' FiOS TV packages violate contract, says ESPN | The Verge
Verizon wants to put ESPN in a sports package in an attempt to move toward a la carte programming. ESPN won't let them because it violates their contract. ESPN and ESPN2 have to be in the big bundles, not extra sports packages.
It's been a while since I crunched the numbers, but I found ESPN's penetration rate (number of houses) and I put that up against Nielsen's total number of houses with TVs. As of that time, just maybe 2-3 years ago, very few households had a TV but didn't have ESPN. ... now, did that count streaming services like AppleTV w/ WatchESPN as a "household with ESPN?" I'm not sure.
I'd be interested to see the number of households that HAVE it (since it's included in basic cable) vs. those that actually WATCH it.
Total Viewers
ESPN 2.28 million (up 6%)
USA 2.18 million (down 20%)
TNT 2.04 million (down 4%)
Disney 1.94 million (down 22%)
TBS 1.87 million (down 10%)
History 1.86 million (down 14%)
Fox News 1.73 million (even)
FX 1.45 million (down 4%)
Discovery 1.41 million (up 1%)
AMC 1.36 million (down 5%)
HGTV 1.34 million (up 5%)
Adult Swim 1.34 million (down 11%)
Nick at Nite 1.31 million (down 2%)
A&E 1.27 million (down 30%)
ABC Family 1.26 million (down 2%)
Lifetime 1.13 million (down 12%)
Syfy 1.13 million (down 7%)
Food 1.09 million (down 5%)
TLC 1.08 million (even)
Bravo 0.99 million (down 3%)
That's the beauty of cable. Everyone is watching something different.So out of estimated 97 million subscribers to cable or satellite, only 2.28 million regularly view ESPN. And THAT'S the most popular cable network?
It would be nice to have ESPN just for college football and basketball. Then drop it. The college football playoff really paid off for ESPN. I guess it broke all cable ratings records.
College Football Playoff final sets ratings record for ESPN, cable TV - LA Times
Indeed it did. Obviously, I have no way of fact-checking this statement, but my service went down for a brief moment during the final game. The phone rep told me that it was because so many people were watching the same thing at the same time...kind of like the effect Howard had on websites during the late 90s.
And I don't understand that "share a password" thing. I mean, I understand how it works, but wouldn't it be safer for the master account owner to set up a subaccount? Wouldn't that do the same thing without allowing potential strangers to mess with my bill?