sadchild
Dude
Murray HeadHere's another one for debate: Murray Head. Hint: He had a big hit with a song from a musical--from the 1970s.
#3 "One Night In Bangkok"
#14 "Superstar"
Murray HeadHere's another one for debate: Murray Head. Hint: He had a big hit with a song from a musical--from the 1970s.
I never realized he sang "Superstar". Was he credited at the time as artist?Murray Head
#3 "One Night In Bangkok"
#14 "Superstar"
I was floored when I recently discovered this (and I posted about it somewhere). He was actually a cast member of the play in London, and then many years later, in NYC, he wrote Bangkok for a Broadway play. Again, I'm not going to look it up, because I already did somewhere.I never realized he sang "Superstar". Was he credited at the time as artist?
If you're going to quote me then quote me in context. Here's what I actually wrote:@jbnv A while back I wrote a post which begins with "There's an article at Village Voice from 2012 discussing this at great length."
Your response was
I took this as you didn't read my post or the article I quoted from. Is that the case?
In short, I have argued and continue to argue that the Top 40 of Billboard Hot 100 is a terrible metric for defining what is and isn't a "hit."If it is, and you didn't read it, I think you should. Because you've pretty much posted about everything covered in that article since.
You expressed frustration on trying to nail down how a OHW is defined (this in the article).
You argued that strictly using the top 40 of the Hot 100 is unacceptable because forgotten 2nd-hits make it so the act isn't a OHW even though they certainly fee like one (this is also in the article, and is the whole point of this thread).
You argued that some of the classic rock songs of all time aren't being called hits (this is also in the article, which asks if Jimi Hendrix and the Grateful Dead are OHWs simply because they technically have only 1 top 40 pop hit).
It sounds like we're all in agreement then.In short, I have argued and continue to argue that the Top 40 of Billboard Hot 100 is a terrible metric for defining what is and isn't a "hit."
What part of all of this aren't we clear about?
We are in agreement what not to use as a metric.It sounds like we're all in agreement then.
Ok cool, wasn't sure which way to read it.That means that I did in fact read it and am summarizing it for people who do not want to read it because it is too long.
Yes, we are all, as far as I can tell, in agreement that one vs two-or-more top 40 hits is not a great method. As evidenced by how many two-top40ers we've called OHWs.In short, I have argued and continue to argue...
I think in most cases the number of top 40s is deceptive. 2 top 40s does not always define a OHW. Nor does a single top 40 guarantee a OHW. The 3 examples I have are Michael Sembelo, Madness and Grateful Dead. By chart logic the later is a OHW the first 2 are not. But I think common sense dictates the opposite. And its not because of program directors today. I never heard those second songs in the 1980s either.Ok cool, wasn't sure which way to read it.
Yes, we are all, as far as I can tell, in agreement that one vs two-or-more top 40 hits is not a great method. As evidenced by how many two-top40ers we've called OHWs.
But among the ways that have been considered a measuring stick, the top 40 route seems to be a popular one out there. I like how we are testing it in this thread - and maybe by analyzing our choices on who the one-hit wonders really are (despite having had 2 top 40s) we'll accidentally devise a better method that's more accurate, patent it, share in the wealth, and retire on an island together in luxury where we can debate it further!
I remember both, I recall Superstar charting before One Night in Bangkok. So, technically he's a two hit wonder.Murray Head
#3 "One Night In Bangkok"
#14 "Superstar"
...or objectively. Is there a question about this?Rembrandts
#14 "Just The Way It Is Baby"
#17 "I'll Be There For You"
I say definitely not a OHW subjectively.
Not sure what year these made the airwaves, but I was clearly not listening to pussy-whipped radio at the time. Baby It's Tonight sounds a little familiar, but that may just be from 1st Wave. Never heard the others.Jude Cole
#16 "Baby It's Tonight"
#32 "Time For Letting Go"
I say definitely is a OHW subjectively. Don't think I've ever heard TFLG? And even if I did back then, I haven't heard it in the last 30 years.
I was expecting his smaller hit to be "Start The Car", which I did hear on the radio back then and still like now. But alas it only peaked at #71, and he actually has two more songs that peaked higher than it: "Tell The Truth" and "House Full Of Reasons".....?
I lol'dI was clearly not listening to pussy-whipped radio at the time
I was clearly not listening to pussy-whipped radio
I liked that album.Jude Cole
#16 "Baby It's Tonight"
#32 "Time For Letting Go"
I say definitely is a OHW subjectively. Don't think I've ever heard TFLG? And even if I did back then, I haven't heard it in the last 30 years.
I was expecting his smaller hit to be "Start The Car", which I did hear on the radio back then and still like now. But alas it only peaked at #71, and he actually has two more songs that peaked higher than it: "Tell The Truth" and "House Full Of Reasons".....?