Annoying Words & Phrases

scotchandcigar

All I wanted was some steak
Feb 13, 2009
24,723
19,728
168
Vacationland
Here's the opening sentence from one of those clickbait stories on my Facebook feed. I'm sure a Pulitzer Prize is on its way.

"Leonardo DiCaprio's 19-year-old girlfriend, who is 49, says she doesn't love him for his money and fame."
 

scotchandcigar

All I wanted was some steak
Feb 13, 2009
24,723
19,728
168
Vacationland
As discussed elsewhere, Ohtani is the first player to have 50 home runs and 50 stolen bases. Here's the headline on CNN

Los Angeles Dodgers’ Shohei Ohtani becomes first player to join 50/50 club

How does one become the first to "join" something? And how can you be in a "club" that never existed and has only you as a member?
 
Last edited:

Channel98

Don't yell or hit.
Feb 2, 2019
11,158
6,726
168
Glendale CA
To clarify, Ohtani is the first MLB player to have 50 home runs and 50 stolen bases in a single season. But yeah, that headline makes no sense. It implies that there has always been a 50/50 club but until today it had no members. Maybe next year he can join the 60/60 club.
 
  • Like
Reactions: sadchild

Channel98

Don't yell or hit.
Feb 2, 2019
11,158
6,726
168
Glendale CA
"Actively concentrating" – as opposed to passively concentrating?

Here are two annoying expressions I see quite often in letters in the Los Angeles Times, including this week: A man writes that an op-ed about fire prevention "hit the nail on the head" and a woman says she "couldn't agree more" with California Governor Newsom's signing of a plastic bag ban into law. The carpentry reference is dumb – nobody was hammering a nail – and why can't people simply say they "agree" instead of saying "I couldn't agree more"?
 

scotchandcigar

All I wanted was some steak
Feb 13, 2009
24,723
19,728
168
Vacationland
It seems to be getting very common that agreeing with someone requires the nonsensical reply of "one-thousand percent!". In the old days, it was merely one-hundred percent; and then for quite a while, it was one-hundred-and-ten percent. You know, the extra 10% gave it that emphasis, like the volume knob that goes to eleven. But now 110% is wimpy; it's barely above the logical limit of 100%. So if you're going for hyperbole, you might as well reach for the stars, and say 1,000%.
 

scotchandcigar

All I wanted was some steak
Feb 13, 2009
24,723
19,728
168
Vacationland
"Actively concentrating" – as opposed to passively concentrating?
Just the implication that the word "listening" isn't enough - and needs to be defined in different terms - is moronic. I took the training, and clearly, the people in the videos were not listening when they were supposed to be listening. That's all they have to say; when it's time for you to listen, then listen. Don't scroll on your phone, or have another conversation, or be working on budgets; just listen. If people listened when they were supposed to, we wouldn't need to describe other words for what they should be doing.

It's funny how they started out with "active listening", which is a bullshit way of saying "listening", as passive listening only applies to background music and noises you can't control. But even "active listening" wasn't adequate. So now it's "actively concentrating".
 

Channel98

Don't yell or hit.
Feb 2, 2019
11,158
6,726
168
Glendale CA
That reminds me of a joke: "What kind of orange juice is this?" "Concentrate." "Okay.........I did, but I still don't know."

An article on the BetterUp website says, "Let’s explore seven types of listening, why they matter and what they can look like." Um, let's not.

 
  • Face Palm
Reactions: scotchandcigar